How tai chi is taught in modern times | ||
classes qigong tai chi kung fu about us reviews a-z
Japanese martial arts
Japanese martial arts are usually taught in a very
methodical, thorough way.
There is a clear syllabus, steps of
progress, grades and some degree of
ongoing continuity.
Treated as a product, a cultural treasure, a
sport or
an educational endeavour, Japanese martial arts
measure up well under scrutiny.
In a Japanese class the student is encouraged to replicate the teachings of
the art perfectly.
Like a carbon copy.
Chinese martial arts
Chinese martial arts are not taught like Japanese
arts.
By comparison there can often seem to be no discernable syllabus, no
continuity and a generally haphazard
approach to teaching the syllabus.
If indeed a syllabus actually
exists.
Some of you have
talked about learning a short form of tai chi, which has certain
transitional motifs eliminated. The reason for these repeating transitions
is to help you flow within the form - to ride over it without thinking. When
these repetitions are cut out, some of the major movements become awkward
and jam together. The sequence loses some of its smoothness.
(Chungliang Al Huang)
Why is tai chi taught this way?
Cultural differences.
Chinese martial arts usually a family or village art used for
self defence.
Sharing with outsiders was not encouraged.
Progress was contingent upon hard work and
how well you got along with the teacher.
Traditionalist
Traditionally, in China a martial arts instructor was very reluctant to take on
new students. How come? If the student's skills were inadequate it
would directly reflect on the teacher.
On a mild level, this made the teacher look incompetent and affected their
reputation. More seriously, it could mean that the teacher would be put to
death for failing in their responsibility.
Consequently, traditional tuition tended to be harsh and severe. The
teacher hammered the student and adhered strictly to Confucian terseness.
Sifu Waller's teacher (Peter Southwood) followed this method.
Teaching
standards
Historically, there was no call to teach tai chi publicly or to
adhere to a recognised system or standard of teaching.
Teachers did whatever they saw fit.
In recent years a number of tai chi teachers have sought to
introduce a more systematic approach.
This is highly commendable but has certain drawbacks.
We strongly encourage you to read The Sword Polisher's Record by Adam Hsu
for further insights.
Tai chi chuan syllabus
Ideally a tai chi class should have a
syllabus akin to a Japanese martial arts school.
There are many facets of the internal
martial arts that need to be studied in a disciplined, clear, uniform
manner...
The list includes:
Partnered drills
Combat drills
All of these skills can be taught
progressively and
methodically. Failure to teach fundamental lessons
in a comprehensive, consistent manner is simply bad teaching.
Traditional values
Stuart Alve Olsen’s book Steal My Art is about his experiences
learning tai chi from T T Liang.
Liang would not simply give the art away to people.
He expected his students to be like thieves: sneaky, cunning, observant and
resourceful.
Our classes
Sifu Waller combines traditional values with
modern teaching.
We provide detailed lessons, a reading list, a website and handouts. But these things
cannot
contain the complete art.
The student is still required to join the dots for
themselves.
Initiative
Confucius believed that a student
must show a high level of initiative:
Waiting to be told what to do shows no initiative at all
Finding things out for yourself shows initiative
Figuring things out for yourself shows a high level of initiative
The internal martial arts
encourage students to find their own way, recognising that some lessons
simply cannot be taught.
Beyond teaching
There are many lessons
that cannot be taught.
Many teachings are akin to Zen koan.
Attempting to explain the material coherently is not so easy, but a direct physical application proves
the point nicely.
If somebody gives you the answer to a koan, do you really
understand at all? Many things in life are only fully
understood when you figure them out for yourself.
Getting it...
A student may be given all the necessary training in order to defend
themselves yet still falter under pressure.
A student may be offered every piece of a puzzle and never succeed in
putting the parts together correctly.
We are all different, and our capacities differ.
The flexibility of the
Chinese martial arts allow for this.
They also recognise that some students may just never 'get it'.
To quote the homily: "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make
it drink."
Learn from Japan?
Too much structure and an art can be
become rigid; physically and mentally.
Too little guidance and framework, and the
tai chi can fold in on itself; becoming worthless.
Amateurism
Tai chi classes in the 20th Century fell prey to bad teaching, little or no syllabus, no
testing of skills, and low
standards.
Unfortunately, teaching methods vary from class to
class, with each
instructor
essentially teaching as they see fit.
This can be good sometimes.
It can also mean sporadic progress, if any.
Whilst a Japanese martial arts teaching approach does not entirely suit
tai chi, it does offer some valuable lessons in terms of consistency and
continuity.
Page created
18 March 1997
Last updated
16 June 2023
▲