The Vinegar Tasters | ||
classes qigong tai chi kung fu about us reviews a-z
Who were The Vinegar
Tasters?
Lao Tzu, Confucius and Buddha. Chinese philosophy and culture stems from a blending of these three traditions.
The Vinegar Tasters
In the
painting we see the three men standing around a vat of vinegar.
Each has dipped his finger into the vinegar and tasted of it.
The expression on each man's face shows his individual
reaction.
Three teachings
The painting is intended to be allegorical and each of the three men represent
one of the three teachings of China.
The vinegar they are tasting represents the essence of life.
The first man has a sour look on his face, the second wears a bitter expression,
but the third man is smiling.
Confucius
To Confucius, life seemed rather sour.
He believed that the present was out of step with the past and that the world
would be a much better place if there were strict rules.
Confucius emphasized a strict order which ruled the affairs of all in his land.
Anything that did not fit into the established order was considered bad.
Buddha
The second figure in the painting - Buddha - considered life on earth
to be bitter.
He saw this world to be filled with attachments and desires that led to
suffering; a setter of traps, a generator of illusions and a revolving wheel of
endless pain.
In order to find peace, Buddha maintained that it was necessary to transcend
this world.
The Buddhist sees the path to happiness constantly being interrupted by the
bitterness of this world.
Lao Tzu
Lao Tzu is the third man in the painting.
According to Lao Tzu, the world was governed by the laws of
nature, not by those
of men.
He maintained that the more man interfered with the natural order of things, the
more out of balance the world became.
As things became unbalanced, trouble followed.
Humour
Lao Tzu is smiling because sourness and bitterness comes from the interfering
and unappreciative mind. Life itself, when understood and
utilized for what it is, is sweet.
That is the message of The Vinegar Tasters.
Synthesis
Huanchu Daoren's book Back to Beginnings illustrates how ancient Chinese thought
was often a synthesis of these three teachings.
Any situation can be regarded from three points of view.
Like Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats?
Confucius seeks to determine and apply the rule, the law, the convention
Buddha considers how your thoughts and emotions affect how you see the situation
Lao Tzu examines balance and equity; recognising that human law and natural order are not necessarily congruent
3 hats
Consider: Someone fails to adhere to the rules...
The Confucian point of view notices this and is aware of the correct
method.
The Buddhist perspective recognises that how you react to the incident will
produce certain emotions; potentially harming you more than the offender.
The Taoist understands that whilst rules exist, people do tend to treat them
flexibly and evaluates a course of action with this in mind.
The resultant action is ultimately a synthesis of these three approaches
to thinking.
Modes of thinking
Once, people thought in terms of magic and
superstition. This was later
replaced by religion and then eventually science. Yet, this model of
progression is simplistic.
Taoism and other ways of thinking existed
alongside superstition, religion and science. These alternate
modes of thinking were
often based on loss of self/ego. Not implicating
oneself in everything.
Beyond ego
Scientific thinking has its merits; especially
when people talk about qi (superstitious thinking). However, we don't
need
to know or understand in order for something
to work.
Just avoid jumping to
conclusions? Not knowing is fine.
If you can discover the answers, then do so. If not, be okay with that.
Ground your thinking in what is, not in
what you already know.
Page created
1 June 1996
Last updated
04 May 2023
▲